Yeah, I made that "Hufflepuff is the stoner house" post.

gpoy

(via kyssthis16)

Source: fadeintorain

mister-sullivan:

oh my perfect.

(via inglouriousbtch)

Source: dorkly.com

(via skip-to-the-end)

Source: lydiasforbes

Characters That Leave Me Sexually Frustrated: Emma Frost

(via mjolniritis)

Source: crystaliaamaquelin

kyssthis16:

sourcedumal:

mmanalysis:

blackfolksmakingcomics:

itswalky:

Johnny Storm

*snickers*

Dwayne McDuffie was right is all I have to say. 

That’s exactly the fucking logic for putting POC in anything
“POC can’t exist here! NOT REALISTIC”
But every single literary trope can? Oh, OK.

This is fuckin’ brilliant.

kyssthis16:

sourcedumal:

mmanalysis:

blackfolksmakingcomics:

itswalky:

Johnny Storm

*snickers*

Dwayne McDuffie was right is all I have to say. 

That’s exactly the fucking logic for putting POC in anything

“POC can’t exist here! NOT REALISTIC”

But every single literary trope can? Oh, OK.

This is fuckin’ brilliant.

Source: itswalky

frickyeah1990s:

do you remember these games?

Source: frickyeah1990s

frickyeah1990s:

Scarlett Johansson with Destiny’s Child in 1998

frickyeah1990s:

Scarlett Johansson with Destiny’s Child in 1998

Source: frickyeah1990s

celluloidfire:

Eyeliner.
Female Trouble, John Waters, 1974.

celluloidfire:

Eyeliner.

Female Trouble, John Waters, 1974.

(via chelsamander)

Source: celluloidfire

piddlebucket:

Nurgle butt and Buffy time

piddlebucket:

Nurgle butt and Buffy time

Source: piddlebucket

metapianycist:

[Screenshot of a headline that says “Steven Moffat: People who call Sherlock and Doctor Who too complex are ‘presumably fairly asinine.’ ” A photograph of Moffat grinning follows.]
confusedtree:

Well that’s because calling his stories complex is quite frankly letting him off too easily - there’s a difference between complex and deliberately inscrutable
See Steven Moffat subscribes to a school of writing previously made famous by JJ Abrams and the rest of the dinguses who wrote Lost in that he understands that being deliberately obtuse about your plot is a cheap and effective way to make people watch your dumb show
I really hate to be that guy singing Russel T Davies’ praises right now because, as Last of the Time Lords, Journey’s End and The End of Time effectively demonstrate, good god is he by no means a perfect writer
But! But but but butt butte he understood that a good story is a good story and that good characters make you care about that good story and what Moffat does instead is beat you about the ears with the same asinine unanswerable questions in an effort to hold you hostage and show up for next week’s episode - and they’re not unanswerable due to complexity, they’re unanswerable because there’s no fucking way you’d know the answer to those questions. What are the Silence? How does River Song know The Doctor? What’s The Doctor’s real name? I don’t feel like watching Sherlock so I can include a Sherlock related question in this list I’m riffing?
There’s a point in all this, I’ll get to it right now
It’s this: if you’ve been paying attention to Steven Moffat’s style of writing you’d have known for ages leading up to this headline that he has no respect for his audience
He’s not a master of “mind-fuck”, he’s a master of “hahaha fuck you”

A+ commentary there. Bolding is mine.
Moffat is the reason I have grown to like New Who less, to the point where I actually find the newest episodes boring because of the sheer amount of unanswered questions that Moffat will probably never answer. He is a master of jerking fans around and it’s irritating. He absolutely  pulls the same stuff with BBC Sherlock, where he’s all “haha fuck you, you have to wait a few years before I’ll tell you how he survives Reichenbach.”

metapianycist:

[Screenshot of a headline that says “Steven Moffat: People who call Sherlock and Doctor Who too complex are ‘presumably fairly asinine.’ ” A photograph of Moffat grinning follows.]

confusedtree:

Well that’s because calling his stories complex is quite frankly letting him off too easily - there’s a difference between complex and deliberately inscrutable

See Steven Moffat subscribes to a school of writing previously made famous by JJ Abrams and the rest of the dinguses who wrote Lost in that he understands that being deliberately obtuse about your plot is a cheap and effective way to make people watch your dumb show

I really hate to be that guy singing Russel T Davies’ praises right now because, as Last of the Time Lords, Journey’s End and The End of Time effectively demonstrate, good god is he by no means a perfect writer

But! But but but butt butte he understood that a good story is a good story and that good characters make you care about that good story and what Moffat does instead is beat you about the ears with the same asinine unanswerable questions in an effort to hold you hostage and show up for next week’s episode - and they’re not unanswerable due to complexity, they’re unanswerable because there’s no fucking way you’d know the answer to those questions. What are the Silence? How does River Song know The Doctor? What’s The Doctor’s real name? I don’t feel like watching Sherlock so I can include a Sherlock related question in this list I’m riffing?

There’s a point in all this, I’ll get to it right now

It’s this: if you’ve been paying attention to Steven Moffat’s style of writing you’d have known for ages leading up to this headline that he has no respect for his audience

He’s not a master of “mind-fuck”, he’s a master of “hahaha fuck you”

A+ commentary there. Bolding is mine.

Moffat is the reason I have grown to like New Who less, to the point where I actually find the newest episodes boring because of the sheer amount of unanswered questions that Moffat will probably never answer. He is a master of jerking fans around and it’s irritating. He absolutely  pulls the same stuff with BBC Sherlock, where he’s all “haha fuck you, you have to wait a few years before I’ll tell you how he survives Reichenbach.”

(via piddlebucket)

Source: hes-so-dishy